Yeah, the Munros tables were revised around eight years ago(?), not long before I finished them. There were various additions and deletions, including three new munros in Glen Coe
Have to say though, two munros on the wee Buachaille is a bit much. No way is Raineach a seperate mountain

Same goes for there being two on the (big) Buachaille.
These two tops are definetly subsiduary peaks and should have been left as Munro Tops.
Sgreamach on the Bidean range I can just about put up with as being the other new munro. But only at a push
The SMC should just leave the tables alone, or if they insist on making any sort of changes then possibly applying the 150m descent rule (like for the Corbett list) would be an improvement. It would however reduce the numbers of munros.
Anyone agree/disgree
